Conspicuous Reviewing: Affiliation with High-status Organizations as a Motivation for Writing Online Reviews
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Religiosity and the Motivation for Social Affiliation.
Although universal, the motivation to affiliate can vary as a function of individual differences and of the characteristics of the target. Three studies explored the extent to which religious beliefs and identity are related to social affiliation motivation. Because most religions advocate affiliation and provide opportunities for frequent experiences of affiliation, we reasoned that religious ...
متن کاملPitfalls of reviewing reviews.
I commend Burton et al. [1] for publishing their review in the journal. Important reviews should be subject to the widest readership and most rigorous critique if they are to properly influence future practice. Reviews that are solely conducted by small groups in academia can miss out on the wider stakeholder engagement journals’ offer that encourages debate and fosters learning. A feature of t...
متن کاملA Writing Support through Peer Reviewing
For communicable writing, reviewing and revising is essential. In this paper, we propose an SNS-based environment to improve writing by repeated collaborative reviewing. The results of an experiment comparing the system against face-to-face collaborative writing show that while face-to-face learners wrote better reports quickly, the system-users could also write reports of the matched quality i...
متن کاملWriting Narrative Literature Reviews
Narrative literature reviews serve a vital scientific function, but few resources help people learn to write them. As compared with empirical reports, literature reviews can tackle broader and more abstract questions, can engage in more post hoc theorizing without the danger of capitalizing on chance, can make a stronger case for a null-hypothesis conclusion, and can appreciate and use methodol...
متن کاملWriting Meta-Analytic Reviews
This article describes what should typically be included in the introduction, method, results, and discussion sections of a meta-analytic review. Method sections include information on literature searches, criteria for inclusion of studies, and a listing of the characteristics recorded for each study. Results sections include information describing the distribution of obtained effect sizes, cen...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World
سال: 2018
ISSN: 2378-0231,2378-0231
DOI: 10.1177/2378023118776848